Search for: "State v. Langston" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
  Langston, Hood's largest campaign contributor at the time, was then hired by Hood to represent the state in the WorldCom case [also known as the MCI case] -- and split $14 million in fees. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:02 am by Philip Thomas
Last year I wrote in this post about the Mississippi Supreme Court's decision in Merchant v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
In that notice, the government informed Scruggs that there was another attempt to corruptly influence a judicial proceeding, referring to the search warrant application for the Langston Law Firm and the information, factual basis, and plea colloquy in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
Dickie Scruggs caused Langston to communicate through others that Delaughter would be considered for a federal district court judgeship, in order to further corruptly influence the outcome of Wilson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
   As a point of interest, you can look back at the documents I posted yesterday in Scruggs Nation, Day 12, and see that both Joey Langston and Tim Balducci are listed as among the counsel for Dickie Scruggs in the Luckey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
McIlvain, 794 S.W.2d at 16; see Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 115 (noting substantial truth doctrine "precludes liability for a publication that correctly conveys a story's `gist' or `sting' although erring in the details"); Langston v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]