Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 21 - 40 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 2:20 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The appellants are the current tenants under 25 leases in Oxwich Leisure Park containing 91 chalets. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:37 pm by Michael Froomkin
Hence, for these purposes, we can value an hour of leisure at the same rate as work.Yes, but both the leisure hour and the work hour should be valued at the marginal rate. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:56 pm by Pam Brannon
If you compare that with information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, like Felony Sentences in State Courts, you can see some of the differences. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
  This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:27 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
      [1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The facts at length: the detailed facts can be found in a whopping big judgment of some 482 paragraphs, which you can read at your leisure on BAILII here. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]