Search for: "State v. Michaels" Results 21 - 40 of 13,526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC goes on to allege that Tapestry “intends to raise prices for Michael Kors through reducing discounts and promotions and pulling back on wholesale. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:39 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
But internal calls are growing for the police chief to step aside as University of California President Michael V. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman of course was the editor in chief, with an editorial board made up of many well-known, high-volume testifiers for the lawsuit industry: Adriane Fugh-Berman, Barry Castleman, Michael R. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:45 am by Brian Leiter
Apt commentary from Cornell law professor Michael Dorf; from the opening paragraph: The positions staked out by the Court's most conservative Justices were themselves Trumpian, not so much in their audacity or mendacity but in their prolixity. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Canada The Michael Geist Blog discusses how the Canadian Government’s Artificial Intelligence plan avoids the hard governance questions. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]