Search for: "State v. Polk" Results 21 - 40 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This summary must include (i) the person or persons affected; (ii) the date the incident was discovered and whether it is ongoing; (iii) whether any data was stolen, altered, accessed or used for any unauthorized purpose; (iv) the effect of the incident on the entity’s operations; and (v) whether the incident has been remediated or is currently being remediated. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State”: Jed Stiglitz’s book The Reasoning State makes the case that the legislature commits problems to the administrative state, which attains its legitimacy through reasoning and competition. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:09 am by John Coyle
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Note that I write this post during the public hearings for the January 6th Commission, which is faithfully documenting an attempted coup of the United States government that would not have been possible without a rampant populist fervor that continues to this day. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]