Search for: "State v. Powell" Results 21 - 40 of 1,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
By denying a person participation in jury service on account of his race,” Powell explained “the State also unconstitutionally discriminates against the excluded juror. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Palmer, especially since most state courts at the time went the other way (that note quotes from an article in the American Journal of Legal History by William Meyer, who has a very interesting forthcoming book on Riggs v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm by Mark Tushnet
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]