Search for: "State v. Sellers"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 4:06 pm
In particular, she noted that one exception is suits “in which a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product knowingly violated a state or federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, and the violation was a proximate cause of the harm for which relief is sought. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
” In 1933, the year the Securities Act was enacted, Roosevelt said, “It changes the ancient doctrine of caveat emptor to ‘let the seller beware,’ and puts the burden on the seller rather than on the buyer. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:42 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) delivered a report to Congress entitled Non-Fungible Tokens and Intellectual Property on March 12, 2024 (“Report”). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
The court applied the two-part test for subject matter eligibility under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Indeed, as the plaintiffs themselves noted, the novel upon which 13 Reasons Why was based "was a hit, making the New York Times' young-adult best-seller list a few times. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:51 am
State of N.Y. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
New York’s unique approach likely stems from Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Seller could appeal, but there’s no requirement that be expeditious. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 10:19 am
Valiente v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Bills restricting the use of noncompete provisions are also pending in other states, including Iowa, Maine, Michigan, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In LePage v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
The court cites to L.H. v. [read post]
