Search for: "State, Ex Rel. v. Dear" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Jim Gerl
Doe ex rel Doe 611 F.3d 888, 54 IDELR 275 (DC Cir 7/6/10) DC Circuit ruled that HO did not exceed his authority where he reduced a disciplinary suspension. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:12 pm by A. Brian Albritton
Dear Readers:I recently came across another interesting example of a court refusing to permit the False Claims Act ("FCA") to be used as remedy for a technical regulatory violation that was unrelated to a claim for payment submitted to the government: US ex rel. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:52 pm by Jim Gerl
Doe ex rel Doe 611 F.3d 888, 54 IDELR 275 (DC Cir 7/6/10) DC Circuit ruled that HO did not exceed his authority where he reduced a disciplinary suspension. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
We have had some time now to ruminate over the South Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in State of South Carolina ex rel. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Further, atomoxetine is effective at relatively low doses, as discussed below, and may safely and effectively be administered once a day. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
To spare you, dear reader, from having to click into another window and to spare my poor typing fingers, I will lazily copy-and-paste: ITs were brought in by the Housing Act 1996, as a means of tackling anti-social behaviour. [read post]