Search for: "State Board of Retirement v. Boston Retirement Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens’ recent book review is still a topic of conversation. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
<> Projected CO2 emissions vary with coal and nuclear power plant retirements - (Mon, 28 Apr 2014) Significant retirements of nuclear and coal power plants in the United States could change the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted by the electric power sector. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
For the complete judgment see: Lawson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
’’ The Boston Globe reports on the ruling, while the New York Times editorial board endorses it. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
News Channel 5 in Nashville reports that retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor spoke about her career yesterday at Middle Tennessee State University. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:46 am
National Protest on DOMA—Michael Lehet (Flickr.com) When some constitutionally suspect classifications (race, religion, alienage, or national origin) are not at issue, nor are any fundamental constitutional rights at stake, a law must be upheld if there is any “reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification” (United States Railroad Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
LEXIS 23394, September 14, 2006 The facts and reasoning are below: [www.ca1.uscourts.gov] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No. 06-1029 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION OF THE BACK BAY, INC.; THE BOSTON PRESERVATION ALLIANCE, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:36 am
As the pre-game setting up of the pieces concluded, last minute procedural steps were being taken in the case of The United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
See also Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
As Article V of the Constitution says, the Amendments “shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:19 am
Briefly, Fredreka Schouten at USA Today writes that a Court ruling in favor of the petitioners in Citizens United may drastically alter 2010 state gubernatorial elections by loosening restrictions on previously prohibited corporate and union donations, while the Boston Globe reports that the firefighters in Ricci v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
” The Washington Post reports on the role played by federal employees in the DOMA litigation, while the editorial board of the Boston Herald calls on the Court to restore the “balanced relationship” between states and the federal government “destroyed” by DOMA. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:01 am
Warren, to set up a law firm in Boston. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
