Search for: "State V. Osman"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
Osman, 2013 Cal. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:14 am
Image sources: Oracio Alvarado and Osman Kalkavan. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
… (extracts), Osman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
Mohamed Osman Mohamud v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:31 am
At para.54 of the Court’s judgement, reference is made to Osman v UK. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:13 pm
As Ars reported back in January 2016, the case (United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of offences… [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Osman held that the police could have such a duty (see also Mammadov v Azerbaijan (Application No. 4762/05) (2009) ). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
Mustafa Ozsusamlar and Osman OzsusamlarU.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:04 am
Tarik Ibn Osman Shah et al. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
The motion in Parhat v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
This strikes me as quite right under the First Amendment precedents, and it echoes another court’s conclusion in Osman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:57 am
However, distinguishing the present case from the leading case of Osman v UK (1998) 29 EHRR 245, Lord Justice Longmore held that the claim for a breach of the ECHR, art 2 should go to trial. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) December 10, 2010 Asylum seeker not protected from deportation as he had carried out acts contrary to the principles of the United Nations. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Mark Latham, former Labour Leader, substantially reduced the defence filed in the defamation case brought against him by journalist Osman Faruqi. [read post]
