Search for: "State by Cooper v. French"
Results 21 - 40
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
All of this cooperation is to be undertaken at the state to state level--no people to people focus here (Ibid., Art. 4). [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:47 am
State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
California, the state which created this tort in 1984, has now done away with it. [read post]
28 May 2011, 3:47 am
A curious note in initial coverage of the matter of NY v DSK was the claim that the United States and France have no extradition treaty.Could that be? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
The Commission also added that the rendition to France by French domestic intelligence agency (DST), was part of a “cooperation” between the French government and the state of Sudan which didn’t amount to a violation of article 5. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
The French Yearbook of Public Law describes itself this way: The objective of the “French Yearbook of Public Law” is to narrow the gap which has tended to develop between the French and the international debate on public law. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
” Patete v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union have now both reached the point at which Advocate General Bot has published his Opinion, which means that all that is left now is for the CJEU to determine whether it will follow his guidance (as happens around 80 per cent of the time) or articulate its own reasoning. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:57 am
He also stated that the majority of the Court of Appeal was wrong to narrow the question of economic continuity to the legal effect of the decision of the French Court in January 2012 and whether this terminated the employment relationship between SeaFrance and its employees. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
