Search for: "State ex rel. Cross v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
This version of Johnson v. [read post]
Example: The mailman delivering mail to John and Sally’s mailbox trips and injures himself on an extension cord the Johnsons’ were using to power their Christmas lights. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
White, 14-10376, are twice-relisted cross-petitions that arise from a grant of habeas relief to a death-row inmate on the ground that the Kentucky state court erred in failing to strike a potential juror for bias. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Since we originally wrote that post in mid-2007, prompted by the terrible decision in State ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
This binding "procedural instruction" is relatively well known in the ERA debate; the Trump Administration's Office of Legal Counsel cited it in a 2020 opinion rejecting the ERA. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm by Joshua Braver
  And in comparison to more common broad statutes like “conspiracy,” there are far fewer norms against abuse of the seditious conspiracy statute given the relatively scant prosecutorial history behind the statute. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Big issues: ex ante v. ex post examination; property v. liability rules; what do we want to protect, exactly; also how the design patent system relates to product design trade dress protection. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]