Search for: "State of Maine V. Chapman"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
The main count, of course, will be the learned intermediary rule itself, but we’ll also add, because we have the data available, whether the state has: (1) applied the learned intermediary rule in medical device cases, and (2) applied the rule to protect pharmacists from direct-to-consumer warning claims.Here goes:There are, by our count, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia, in which the learned intermediary rule has been adopted either by the… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:04 am
Chapman * Allegedly Wrong VeRO Notice of Claimed Infringement Not Actionable–Dudnikov v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
It is merely a power to compel the production of the originals and transcripts sent to, or received from, any place out of the United Kingdom; and the main purpose of that provision is to enable the authorities to detect and deal with attempts at spying by foreign agents. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
Chapman, 388 N.E.2d 541, 548 (Ind. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
The paintings reflect nautical scenes from the War of 1812, including the famous battle between USS Constitution v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The main function of these amendments is to entrench journalist’s rights to remuneration for the use of their content whilst safeguarding copyright ownership. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Below is the text of the main part of the comment letter followed by the list of the eighty professors. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Mo. 2007).Maine: Violette v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:41 am
In relation to sentencing in the Crown Court, there was some Court of Appeal authority on sentencing which arose from riots in Bradford, West Yorkshire back in 2001 – see R v Chapman 2002 and R v Najeeb 2003. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm
In Chapman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
So for Chapman v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 1:46 pm
Ltw@LtwLaw.com to learn more. (36) @MaineTaxGuru – Bill – Maine tax law wonk, bad guitar player, cool uncle, three time @taxgirl top 100 must follow tax twitter feeds. (37) @MD_Herbert – Michael Herbert – State Tax Person of the Year 2012 for Gillette v FTB. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
As Judge Murray Gurfein stated, “the security of the Nation is not at the ramparts alone. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
I recommend going to the main site and browsing through the recent Roberts posts. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
The United States Code contains dozens of criminal conspiracy statutes. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
