Search for: "State of Maine V. Watson"
Results 21 - 40
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
The pending amendments to the Act make two main changes. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
Previously, a workers’ compensation judge ordered medical marijuana payment in the matter of Watson v. 84 Lumber. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:53 pm
Maine became the first state to respond to Watson's campaign, ratifying the proposal on April 27, 1983. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
”) State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
Hawaii v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
The ACLU’s main points track its brief. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
He wrote letters to state officials, and the amendment was ratified in Maine in 1983 and Colorado in 1984. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
“On Friday 13 February the Judicial Office was made aware of the existence of a summons containing certain allegations against a number of individuals including part-time sheriff Peter Watson.The Lord President’s Private Office immediately contacted Mr Watson and he offered not to sit as a part-time sheriff on a voluntary basis, pending the outcome of those proceedings.Mr Watson e-mailed a copy of the summons to the Lord President’s Private Office on Saturday 14… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am
Key also voiced his approval for the Philippines v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Watson) (1975) 13 Cal. 3d 652, 658; see also San Diego Unified Port District v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Groupe SEB USA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The verbal fillers uh and um are defined as “verbal interruptions that do not relate to the proposition of the main message. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:08 pm
Watson Pharma., Inc., No. 2013-1409 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:20 pm
The Conan Doyle Estate also dispatches with what would seem to be contradictory case law, Silverman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Watson Pharm., Inc. that routine experimentation is "not without bounds. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an… [read post]
