Search for: "State of Maine v. Anderson" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
Thirty-six other states and various tobacco control and anti-smoking groups support the Maine appeal. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm by John Ellis
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:25 am by Rantanen
Guest Post by Jonas Anderson, Assistant Professor at American University Washington College of Law Yesterday morning I attended the highly anticipated oral argument in Mayo v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:31 pm by joel
”  In its fight for the trademark, one of the main issues was the commonality of the word and the fact that it is used by many websites in various contexts. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:28 am by John Gregory
The Utah Supreme Court this week held that electronic signatures gathered through a web site were valid signatures for the purpose of nominating a person to run for elected office: Anderson v Bell 2010 UT 47 June 22, 2010. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
Some states, such as Florida, Oklahoma, Georgia, Maine and Texas, mandate that mail ballots be received by election officials no later than Election Day in order to be counted. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
In Maine, voter advocacy groups filed a state court case that alleged that the state failed to provide any training on handwriting analysis or signature comparison and simply instructed election officials to determine whether the signatures “appear to have been made by the same person. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]