Search for: "State of Maine v. Fisher" Results 21 - 40 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2007, 7:39 am
Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2006), the court stated that the seriousness of the underlying criminal offense cannot be the main or primary reason for a revocation sentence. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:07 am
Kende responds as follows: [I]n the Fisher v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The main points of the petition was that the Court had left open that very issue in its 1980 decision in Jenkins v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:17 am by Lyle Denniston
The lawsuits are, in a way, sequels to the Court’s ruling last year in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Choice between federal and state courts implicates fundamental questions of fairness [Eric Alexander, Drug and Device Law on Supreme Court certiorari petition in Pfizer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Supp. 1048, 1058, (D.D.C. 1987) (granting summary judgment against hospital strict liability claim under Fisher), aff’d in part & vacated in part on other grounds, 851 F.2d 437 (D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Sidhu raises two concerns with the “critical mass” argument invoked to justify the affirmative action program under challenge in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Bruce Khula
  It is also an open question how the forthcoming decision by the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
” In CTS Corp. v. [read post]