Search for: "State of Maine v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2021, 11:36 am by Pamela Wolf
They argued that Johnson & Johnson/Janssen used cells ultimately derived from an aborted fetus to produce its vaccine, as did Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech in researching their vaccines. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:16 am by Jordan Bublick
" But there is a "but" - this rule states "but see" I.O.P. 7 which provides that in section 2, that "[u]nder the law of this circuit, published opinions are binding precedent" and cites to  Martin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  Moreover, new House Speaker Mike Johnson is a strong convention proponent; he was instrumental in pushing through an Article V application when he was in Louisiana’s Legislature. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  “This session explores the 1902 landmark decision Roberson v. [read post]