Search for: "State of Tennessee v. Robert Page" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Pruitt     Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville 08b0016p.06 In re: Bettye Zwosta v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] In Favor of the Prosecution Robert Lark v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
 Although stare decisis is not an "inexorable command" it is nevertheless the desirable course as it promotes the predictable and consistent development of law (Payne v Tennessee) and avoids the expensive reopening of litigation. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 pm
History is seldom page-turning; here, the true events of Gettysburg compose a thriller. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
State of Ohio     Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0737n.06  Heartwood v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In Alabama and Tennessee, the states immediately conceded in pending litigation that their admitting-privilege laws were unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Crawford, a U.S. district court in Tennessee recently came to the same conclusion in Harbison v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm by Ken
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]