Search for: "State v. $18,000"
Results 21 - 40
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
The following piece is adapted from my newly-released eCasebook “Cybersecurity Law, Policy, and Institutions” (v.3.1), which is available free and in full (270+ pages) in pdf format here. [read post]
28 May 2021, 8:31 am
P. 6.904(3)(k); see also Kufer v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:28 pm
On February 10, in Hamen v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:14 pm
The Court relied on Barnes v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
Sutton v Norwich (2021) EWCA Civ 20, on appeal from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (2020) UKUT 0090 (LC), 20th March 2020. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm
Russia, we now know, used SolarWinds’ hacked program to infiltrate at least 18,000 government and private networks. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Compensation of £18,000 each was a warded to the first and second claimants. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
According to the report, 2,000 of the United States’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies, including 50 of the nation’s largest police departments, either have purchased MDFTs or have access to these tools. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs in Sanchez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:45 pm
From Dinkins v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:41 am
Troia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm
Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm
The contract is valued at approximately $18,000 annually. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:37 pm
The Ninth Circuit has granted rehearing en banc in an interesting venue case, United States v. [read post]
