Search for: "State v. Aarhus"
Results 21 - 40
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:54 pm
Stichting Natuur en Milieu & Pesticide Action Network Europe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:36 pm
Here’s the programme (available for download on the registration page): Wednesday, 9 May 2012 (Venue: “Roma Tre” University - Aula Magna Rettorato, Via Ostiense 159) Registration (16,00-16,30) Opening session (16,30 – 16,45) Guido Fabiani, Rector, “Roma Tre” University Savino Mazzamuto, Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice, “Roma Tre” University The Europeanisation of private law: problems and perspectives (16,45-18,30)… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Prince Charles, oysters and environmental information Aarhus shows its teeth to Belgium Ministry of Justice on Aarhus and environmental judicial review: its get out of jail card? [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
H. and Others v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Sino, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2249 (Admin) (25 August 2011) October 11, 2011 5 years detention of Algerian found to be unlawful by High Court: failure to co-operate with removal does not of itself justify immigration detention. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:20 pm
This Aarhus-derived provision requires member states to provide for a route for challenging decisions involving the EIA process. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The exception was created to comply with the UK’s obligations under the Aarhus Convention. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:56 am
Now to the South African case, the simplified title of which (Biowatch v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
April 15, 2011 Rosalind English ‘Fairness’ in an unfair world April 15, 2011 Rosalind English Analysis: US State Department’s review of UK Human Rights April 14, 2011 Catriona Murdoch Pearls and badgers – location, location, location April 14, 2011 David Hart QC Tick tock tick tock April 13, 2011 Adam Wagner Human rights, anti-obesity surgery and the NHS purse April 13, 2011 Adam Wagner Aarhus breaches all round? [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Freeze v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Network Rail [2006] EWHC 1133 (QB) (Railtrack), or YL v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
This purely subjective approach – assessing costs on the basis of a particular claimant - did not fulfil the Aarhus requirements as interpreted by Suliivan LJ in R (Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1006. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
(United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
The essence of Aarhus is the requirement that participating states should make available a review procedure for environmental decisions which is ‘fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive’. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:09 am
Coedbach Action Team Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2010] EWHC 2312 (Admin) – Read judgment A recent decision of the High Court, relating to a challenge to planning permission for a power station, could significantly limit access to environmental justice for local community groups. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm
University of Aarhus University of Munster v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:41 pm
The inability of the RSPB to provide such an undertaking in damages led to the unfortunate consequence in the case of R. v Secretary of State for the Environment Ex p. [read post]
