Search for: "State v. Adam E. Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Rogers College of Law Press Regulation in a Converged Environment Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 217/2016, Ian Walden Two Views of First Amendment Thought Privacy, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Adam J. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:03 am by Nicholas Gebelt
 This is also true even if a divorce decree states that a former spouse will be responsible for any amounts due on previously filed joint returns. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
At the Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog, Adam Steinman excerpts some of the highlights from yesterday’s per curiam decision in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:31 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Anthony Waller, No. 106,102 (Reno)Direct appeal; Felony murderDavid E. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
We are very pleased to announce Lawfare‘s first e-book, Lawfare on the National Defense Authorization Acts, which is now available in Kindle format on Amazon for $4.99. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
  Roger Runningen and Hans Nichols of Bloomberg report on the story, as do Mark Landler of the New York Times, Richard Wolf and David Jackson of USA Today, Laura Meckler and Carol E. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A-Z on E-Discovery: What Does the Future Hold? [read post]