Search for: "State v. Arizona Corporation Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2022, 2:44 pm by Unknown
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (National Environmental Policy Act; National Historic Preservation Act) Caremark LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
   A decision  by the Court last year, clearing the way for unlimited spending by corporations in federal elections (Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am by Matthew Scarola
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In the states, we have had a viral contagion of state RFRA amendments that would make it possible for businesses to defend refusals to do business with homosexuals and/or same-sex couples (and in Arizona, with women, minorities, and the disabled, among others). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am by Stephen Wermiel
Federal Election Commission that corporations and labor unions have a First Amendment right to engage in independent spending to influence elections. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Curaden USA, an Ohio corporation headquartered in Arizona, is a subsidiary of Curaden AG that promotes Curaden AG products, including the Curaprox Ultra Soft CS 5460 toothbrush, throughout the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
As Judge Noonan described the jury's findings in his dissent, "Irvin, the chairman of the Arizona Corporation Commission, worked determinedly for a period of four months to promote the merger of an Arizona utility company with another utility and to defeat a merger proposed by Southern Union over $100 million more beneficial to the Arizona company" in exchange for a "bribe" that was never paid, because Southern… [read post]