Search for: "State v. Bakke"
Results 21 - 40
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am
Nevertheless, she also stated that “race-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:30 am
Bakke, forgetting its Southern origins and weakening it in the process. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:50 pm
Because I am teaching a course this fall on the fourteenth amendment, I’ve been meaning to post on the upcoming big case, Fisher v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 11:22 am
Bakke, back in 1978. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
See Village of Arlington Heights, Bakke, and Alexander v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:54 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:15 am
In Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Supreme Court reconsideration of its holding, in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
The case, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [8] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:31 am
The first case is Morse v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
Bakke, 438 U. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Anders gave a legal history talk discussing the range of responses to Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
It is Bakke v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:30 am
Justice Powell’s solo concurrence in Bakke v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm
In the 1978 Bakke case, however, Justice Lewis Powell rejected the idea that racial preferences by state universities are constitutionally permissible on compensatory justice grounds. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:28 am
(This was in some measure modified by Bakke's interpretation of Title VI in 1978, but even after that proof of hostility is not required for Title VI to apply.) [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 10:49 am
Johnson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
