Search for: "State v. Banerjee"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:19 am
In Kedar Nath v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 8:12 am
(Vide: State of Bihar & Ors. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
In such circumstances, and against the backdrop of the law generally in this field being in a state of rapid flux at this time, the Court of Appeal in Greene might certainly be forgiven if, with the benefit of hindsight, it appears that it failed to apply Re S correctly. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:36 am
His submission, by David Pannick and David Sherborne, sets out UK authority (such as the the Spycatcher case, Lord Woolf in the Flitcroft decision, the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v Banerjee, and the Court of Appeal in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Singh considers two cases, Bayer v Natco and Novartis AG v Union of India, to see how compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals and evergreening of patents are dealt with by the Indian judiciary.Part VII “Lores of IP during wartime”Arpan Banerjee and Dana Beldiman, in Chapter 14, “International Trade Mark Enforcement Under the Versailles Treaty: A Case Study of Sanatogen”, discuss how the Bombay High Court applied IP-related provisions of the… [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
These delays have taken place in many of the recent privacy and confidence actions, for example, Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers, Napier v Pressdram, and Cream Holdings v Banerjee. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Swire, Ohio State University (OSU) – Michael E. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Narayana Rao AIR 1983 Mad 9, Aparna Banerjee v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
(Graham v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Banerjee ([2005) 1 AC 253), coupled with the recent emphasis by Strasbourg on reputation as a right under Art.8, has served to revive the debate as to whether the rule in Bonnard v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
Gomtibai v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:39 pm
If there is any excepted matter which is raised by the petitioner as claimant, it will be open to the State to object thereto, inter alia, under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Thank you Hal [Scott] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today. [read post]
