Search for: "State v. Barts" Results 21 - 40 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Also at this blog, Katie Bart and Kalvis Golde put the announcement in historical perspective. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald suggests that “[a] reasonable compromise” in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
In its opinion, the court cited United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:17 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) QFS Scaffolding Ltd. v Sable & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 682 (17 June 2010) Keefe v The Isle of Man Steam Packet Company Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 683 (17 June 2010) Seadrill Management Services Ltd & Anor v OAO Gazprom [2010] EWCA Civ 691 (17 June 2010) Bradley Fold Travel Ltd & Anor v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 695 (18 June 2010) Ministry of Justice v Carter [2010] EWCA Civ 694 (18 June… [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm by Cynthia Wong
(As Harold Feld at Public Knowledge explains, turning off part of the telephone network also violates the Federal Communications Act.)BART claims that it was acting within the scope of a 1969 Supreme Court decision, Brandenburg v. [read post]