Search for: "State v. Bently"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Lionel Bently Dr. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
(Bently’s first, historical question: “What it is that we identify as new? [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
Professor Lionel Bently of the University of Cambridge has explored proposals EU press publishers right in a post on the IP Kat Blog. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Bently & M. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Lionel Bently: UK history. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Reason was that the answer by the European Court of Justice (Arsenal Football Club plc vs Matthew Reed) on whether non-origin-related use could constitute trademark infringement, was considered uncertain and controversial by UK professors Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Celebrities in ads: federal and state infringement, federal and state dilution, false endorsement, defamation, and right of publicity are all possibilities. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
Intellectual PropertyK1420.5 .G56 2010Global copyright : three hundred years since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to cyberspace / edited by Lionel Bently, Uma Suthersanen and Paul Torremans.Cheltenham, UK Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar, c2010. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
”3 And some states, such as Massachusetts, explicitly noted in their subsequent copyright acts that the “legal security of the fruits of [a person’s] study and industry … is one of the natural rights of all men. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Bently is unconvinced about this increased exposure—need more evidence.McGeveran: thinks it’s so but that it won’t necessarily increase likely confusion. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Underkuffler states that this historically broad definition of property was tied to the notion of human beings as masters of themselves; it involved the maintenance of personal integrity in both a physical and nonphysical sense. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
