Search for: "State v. Bickel"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
United States, which reawakened Commerce Clause review of federal legislation yet hardly ushered in a new era of robust judicial review; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
9 May 2019, 5:08 pm
Second, the flexible doctrines announced by the panel could provide some opportunity for cultivating what Jeff Dunoff, channeling Alexander Bickel, has called the “passive virtues. [read post]
9 May 2019, 5:08 pm
Second, the flexible doctrines announced by the panel could provide some opportunity for cultivating what Jeff Dunoff, channeling Alexander Bickel, has called the “passive virtues. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
In his dissent in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
In a 1991 case, Freytag v. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:01 am
The distinction between the Supreme Court’s judgment and precedent is often conflated due to Cooper v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
If Baker v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:35 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
The issue in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:29 am
Next Monday the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Virginia State Board of Elections, and Katzenbach v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
The Government, borrowing from Alexander Bickel, invites the Court to issue a more minimal ruling. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:32 pm
Zivotofsky v, Kerry provides an illustration of how the Supreme Court can make poor decisions. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Supreme Court’s pronouncement that interracial marriage bans are unconstitutional in Loving v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
