Search for: "State v. Blight"
Results 21 - 40
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
The New York Court of Appeals today reversed the Columbia "blight" case, Kaur v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
That may not be healthy for the State. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:24 am
Borough of Paulsboro, 191 N.J. 344 (2007) case and the ERETC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Once ‘blight’ is found, the state can flip property to a private developer. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:37 pm
New York State Urban Development Corp. the case in which the Appellate Division struck down an attempt to take property north of Columbia University in New York City because of the record reflected overwhelming private benefit and lack of "blight? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
Kaur v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
In Noghrey v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
New York State Urban Development Corporation, which approved of Manhattanville’s condemnation, and also the political rhetoric and blight reports that justified the taking. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:58 am
(Ilya Somin) I recently wrote an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to hear the Columbia University blight takings case, on behalf of the Institute for Justice (the public interest law firm that litigated Kelo v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
[JURIST] The New Jersey Supreme Court [official website] Wednesday ruled [PDF text] that for the state to constitutionally take private property, it must show that the property is blighted. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:01 am
Ct. of Appeals Oral Arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:54 pm
We've been busy filing an appellate brief and drafting another, so until now, haven't had the chance to post up links about Tuesday's New York Court of Appeals oral argument in Kaur v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:26 pm
Rufo, the owner of TR Gretz, LP, which owned the Gretz Brewing Building, received a violation notice from the Department of License and Inspection, stating that the Property was vacant, lacked doors and windows with frames and glazing, and constituted a “blighting influence” as defined by section PM-202 of the Philadelphia Property Maintenance Code. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:14 am
After a series of challenges, the United States Supreme Court approved the condemnation in Kelo v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
The court's total deference to the stated reasons for a taking establishes a standard so minimal, it is doubtful that even the majority in Kelo v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 11:48 am
” In Goldstein et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:02 am
Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
