Search for: "State v. Brecht"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2015, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 11:33 am
As she argued, “Given the strength of Ayala’s prima facie case and the comparative juror analysis his attorneys could have developed if given the opportunity to do so, little doubt exists that counsel’s exclusion from Ayala’s Batson hearings substantially influenced the outcome,” which should have been enough, in her view, to prove that the California Supreme Court’s harmless error determination was contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in Brecht… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:58 am
Assuming without deciding that a federal constitutional error occurred, the error was harmless under Brecht v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Pensinger v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 2254 that governs review of a state court’s holding that jury instructions could not have reasonably misled the jury on state law; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit properly found that any alleged error was harmful under Brecht v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
§ 2254 that governs review of a state court's holding that jury instructions could not have reasonably misled the jury on state law; and (2) whether the Sixth Circuit properly found that any alleged error was harmful under Brecht v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
If anything, Justice Kennedy’s first query of the day proved the point, when he encouraged Urbanski to turn to the second question presented (which the Justices had added) on whether, on the merits, the Ninth Circuit’s de novo analysis of the harmlessness of the state trial court’s error had misapplied the Supreme Court’s standard for prejudice under Brecht v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
But Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Sconnie Nation LLC Doesn’t Conflict with Cariou v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
United States Chappell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
The panel was unanimous, holding that any Eddings error was harmless under Brecht. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm
Pliler and Brecht v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
Pliler and Brecht v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
United States, 12-862, which asks the Court to overrule Feres v. [read post]
