Search for: "State v. Briggs"
Results 21 - 40
of 334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
Briggs and Chicago v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:41 am
Briggs v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
The Briggs case was consolidated with United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
Briggs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
The United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Briggs Ave. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:36 pm
LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:21 am
Briggs v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court on April 17, 2013 issued its opinion in McNeely v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:24 pm
Briggs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
I previously noted that the result in Briggs and Clay would have been different had they been tried today, due to the R.C.M. 912(f)(4) change designed to compel a different result in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:27 am
In Exmark Manufacturing Company v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
” This is Lord Briggs introduction to his judgment in Guest v Guest and this also summarises the facts at issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:27 am
Detroit Public Schools, Case No. 138168; granted the State leave to file an overlength merits brief in People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
Laura Briggs, Haaland v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:05 am
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker The concurrence and dissent in Briggs et al v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am
This decision is only the second application by a state supreme court of the rule of capture to hydraulic fracturing (from Texas, Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
