Search for: "State v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company " Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2006, 6:15 pm
State attorneys general, who must approve arrangements between Bristol-Myers and generic drug makers as a result of earlier litigation, rejected the deal between the drug companies. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
By Lennon Haas and Noah Finkel Seyfarth Synopsis:  Since the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:49 am by Joy Waltemath
The court does not have personal jurisdiction over any opt-in servers who did not work in Pennsylvania, the employer contended, citing the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
Supreme Court established limitations on personal jurisdiction over non-resident corporate defendants in state court “mass” actions in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:57 am
Supreme Court decided patients can sue drugmakers over injuries from medicines approved by the government, long-stalled lawsuits against GlaxoSmithKline Plc and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. are again moving toward trials. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:39 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
  The Court reviewed several notable United States Supreme Court Opinions, the most recent of which was in the case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The court provided a detailed summary of the current status of the law pertaining to personal jurisdiction based upon a review of several notable United States Supreme Court Opinions, the most recent of which was in the case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in TC Heartland v. [read post]