Search for: "State v. Broome"
Results 21 - 40
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time… [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:34 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:26 am
Source: State v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
Like in this case.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:23 pm
Town of Dryden (Tompkins County) and Cooperstown Holstein Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Broom claimed that he did have good cause for not presenting the records in the state courts: the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in State ex rel Steckman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
School Dist., Supreme Court, Broome County, 2010 NY Slip Op 20360, Decided on September 3, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Judge Philip R. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:31 am
The decision was an exception to the United States Supreme Court decision in April 2008 in Baze v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Francis v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:59 am
The May 8, 2013 Supreme Court opinion in Broom v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Cases like Bank of the United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:47 am
PROPERTY – FROZEN BURST WATER PIPES – VACANCY – REASONABLE CARE TO MAINTAIN HEAT Landsman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:26 am
John Diehl lives in Washington State but owns eight vacant lots in Crescent City. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
The anatomy of a disputed claim for GML §207-c benefitsParker v Village of Johnson City, 2010 NY Slip Op 50957(U), Decided on May 26, 2010, Supreme Court, Broome County, Ferris D. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
And now, in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 9:06 am
This was the situation in Kimminau v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
The majority states that the specification did not define transverse and perpendicular to be coequal in meaning. [read post]