Search for: "State v. Butts" Results 21 - 40 of 654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:50 am by centerforartlaw
Another difference between R-Space and marketspaces in the United States is that trading between consumers is prohibited. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:18 am by SHG
This was not the state of journalism for which Times v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am by Sasha Volokh
Another case cited in Schechter Poultry as an example of an unproblematic private delegation was Butte City Water v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In a similar vein, we are thankful for the helpful briefing and argument we received from the United States as amicus curiae. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 am by SHG
And parents are able to opt their kids out if they reject the idea of allowing the school to spank their kid on the butt. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 11:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
At its weekly conference held on August 24, 2022, the California Supreme Court acted to modify its recent majority opinion in County of Butte v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
An August 12, 2022 letter to the Supreme Court – signed onto by more than a dozen leading CEQA attorneys not representing parties to the action or other clients – has requested the Court to modify its August 1, 2022 majority opinion in County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Butts, which extends the actual malice requirement to public figure plaintiffs; Gertz v. [read post]