Search for: "State v. C. A."
Results 21 - 40
of 39,658
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 12:02 pm
The Court held that the evidence did not establish genuine use for ‘chicken sandwiches,’ but did establish partial use that was sufficient to maintain the category of ‘food prepared from meat products’.Alessandro Cerri commented on the CJEU decision (Joined Cases C‑662/22 and C‑667/22) on the country-of-origin principle, which clarified that information service providers are only subject to regulation by their home Member State. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:49 am
There appeared to be a sense of that in the 8-1 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:06 am
From Webb v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:50 am
John C. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
United States) and presidential immunity (Trump v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:27 am
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am
Further, reciprocal transfers, which got 400 points, not 450, were expressly stated as not being considered ‘out of turn’ at 5.3.12. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:27 am
This is pointed out in the 2001, United States Supreme Court opinion styled, Egelhoff v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Below is my column on Fox.com on the ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
C. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
Assuming C. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
Such was the case in Kerson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:27 am
This case was dismissed because the plaintiff was unable to show his whistleblowing was protected under this statute, intended to protect against Wall Street financial abuses.The case is Katzel v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:54 am
DOS v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 4:42 pm
From DeSantis v. [read post]
