Search for: "State v. Capital Coal Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
CAPITAL CASEEXECUTION DATEIN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESJAMES CALLAHAN,Petitioner,RICHARD ALLEN, et al. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read blog]
5 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 1:55 pm
Supreme Court’s 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
See also, Lower Vein Coal Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
Lurgi Energie Und Entsorgung GmbH- the matter was dismissed for becoming infructuous on 07.01.2007- see order) 09.03.06: Delhi High Court stayed proceedings befor it.03.04.07: In view of the dismissal of Civil Appeal 339/ 2003, the Supreme Court listed the matter alongwith Civil Appeal 7019/2005-Bharat Aluminium Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
United States and Carter v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private lending arm of the World Bank which is headquartered in the US entered into a loan agreement with Coastal Gujarat Power Limited, a company based in India, to finance the construction of a coal-fired power plant in Gujarat. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
Inter-Chem Coal Co., Inc., 41 F.3d 567, 570 (10th Cir. 1994)). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Allen, No. 08–9156 In capital habeas proceedings, a court of appeals' reversal of a grant of petitioner's petition is affirmed where a state court's conclusion that defense counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of petitioner's mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Allen, No. 08–9156 In capital habeas proceedings, a court of appeals' reversal of a grant of petitioner's petition is affirmed where a state court's conclusion that defense counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of petitioner's mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. [read post]
