Search for: "State v. Carrillo" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Lewis
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
María Carmelina Londoño-Lázaro & Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli, The Control of Conventionality: Developments in the Case Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and Its Potential Expanding Effects in International Human Rights Law Gabrielle Simm, Disaster Militarism? [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Concluding there was ample evidence that Walmart was a joint employer of the workers at its warehouse in Mira Loma, California, a federal district court rejected the retailer’s motion for summary judgment on the workers’ FLSA and wage and related claims under state law (Carrillo v Schneider Logistics Trans-Loading and Distribution, Inc, January 14, 2014, Snyder, C). [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:08 am
King Subscription Required WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Petitioner Fails to Show Warrant Is Defective Or Prove He Is Not a Fugitive; Court Denies Writ People (ex. rel Carrillo-Olague) v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:12 am by Amy Howe
” And at the LGBTQ Policy Journal, Sophia Carrillo looks at the influence of the Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Carrillo, is “an appraisal of California's retiring Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye's tenure and a profile of the state's new chief justice, Patricia Guerrero. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 8:57 pm
The detective called Gary Lowe, a lecturer specializing in sexual-assault training for law enforcement at California State University Sacramento. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:31 am by Michael J. Petro
Carrillo‐Figueroa, 34 F.3d 33, 39 n.5 (1st Cir. 1994); United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
In Rios v Carrillo the court extended to residential tenancies a prior decision by the New York Court of Appeals, holding that commercial landlords did not have to mitigate damages — unless the lease stated otherwise. [read post]