Search for: "State v. Caruso" Results 21 - 40 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint "set forth allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant[s'] alleged malpractice might be reasonably inferred" (Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407, 410; see Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint "set forth allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant[s'] alleged malpractice might be reasonably inferred" (Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407, 410; see Fielding v Kupferman, 65 AD3d 437, 442). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm by Edward Smith
Chris Caruso, a GM Engineer, testified in the case of  Lee v Silviera that the data referred to above was never designed to be used in accident reconstruction. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793; see e.g. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by David Oscar Markus
Let's Just Cut to the Chase, Please GUEST POST BY MICHAEL CARUSO Yesterday, the 11th Circuit decided U.S. v. [read post]