Search for: "State v. Cathcart"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Byline Times has a piece by Brian Cathcart entitled “Another Anti-Muslim Piece in Murdoch’s Flagship Paper Ends in a Libel Settlement”. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:53 pm
See State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
”, Frontline Club, Panel Includes Brian Cathcart and David Aaronovitch. 1-27 August, 5pm, Comedy: ‘One Rogue Reporter‘, Rich Peppiatt / Something for the Weekend, Edinburgh Festival. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
” [106] The case has been analysed on INFORRM by Brian Cathcart. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
In Sherman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
” We had a post about it written by Brian Cathcart. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
Brian Cathcart summarised Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3 of the hearing for Inforrm. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Brian Cathcart argues this signals the Labour Party’s renewed support for Leveson-style press regulation, albeit it in a low-key fashion. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
United States Smartmatic, [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:01 am
For example, after Ukraine banned the Russian Sputnik V vaccine in 2021, Russia increased personal attacks targeting key Ukrainian politicians, including President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the Ukrainian minister of health, on Telegram channels that were purportedly set up to share news by local journalists in Ukraine. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am
We had a post by Brian Cathcart on the history of IPSO. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:07 am
MAN, Cathcart v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
United States: A Haitian-American journalist has been ordered to never again publish anything about the prime minister of Haiti [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Brian Cathcart has raised questions about the case on the Hacked Off campaign website, asking “how did the News of the World penetrate the official security around him? [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
