Search for: "State v. Chong" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am by Giesela Ruehl
Harris, Understanding public policy limits to the enforceability of forum selection clauses after Douez v Facebook, pp. 50-96 Abstract: This article explores the nature of public policy limits to the enforcement of forum selection clauses, recently considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Douez v Facebook. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 9:19 pm
Illueca, Enforcing the United Nations Security Council’s Arms Embargo on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: A Case Study of the Legal Consequences of the Chong Chon Gang Incident Stephen Allen, Dean v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am by Alex Potcovaru
Moscati on developments in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Jane Chong flagged yesterday’s Senate and House Intelligence Committee hearings on Russian meddling in the U.S. elections. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
In travel ban news, on Monday the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit announced its ruling upholding most of the injunction in Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Speaking at the press conference, Trump reaffirmed Article V of NATO, committing the United States to the alliance’s promise of collective self-defense. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
Jane Chong summarized the oral arguments heard in the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hawaii v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lawfare liveblogged both events, and Jane Chong summarized the oral argument. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]