Search for: "State v. Class"
Results 21 - 40
of 28,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 7:31 am
The plaintiffs’ attorneys in the California action have indicated their intention to file similar class actions in other states. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:09 pm
Karlton (Eastern District of California) examined the contents of a class notice proposed by the plaintiff in Adoma v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:00 am
TD Ameritrade and what it means for national and state securities class-action claims. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 11:19 am
Today the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its opinion in Wilcox v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:37 pm
In Van v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
Ct., March 31, 2010) in which the Court held that a New York state rule prohibiting class actions to recover statutory penalties did not apply in a case filed in federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
See State of Tennessee v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Class Certification order in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:48 am
See Galvan v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:00 am
The question presented was whether the FAA prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of class-wide arbitration procedures. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Litigation of Investor Claims: State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Alvarez stated that the principles of collateral estoppel ensure that the absent putative class members’ interests were adequately represented in the prior proceeding. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
In Brinkley v Monterey Financial Services Inc., the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s remand order, and held that a plaintiff cannot remand an otherwise valid CAFA case to state court when only a portion of the class meets the two-thirds citizenship requirement. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm
See Vargas v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:14 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 6:52 am
For more than a decade, United States District Courts have taken a stark approach to the need for appropriate class definitions and ascertainability in federal class actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
