Search for: "State v. Clinton"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
So while what seems to have been done with the Clinton Foundation might have violated some state laws, the federal statutes that would seem to cover it are unconstitutional.2. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
So while what seems to have been done with the Clinton Foundation might have violated some state laws, the federal statutes that would seem to cover it are unconstitutional.2. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
The last three (Denedo, Clinton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
SPITZER v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:42 pm
Clinton was the 2016 Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, United States Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, a United States Senator for the State of New York from 2001 to 2009, and the First Lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:01 pm
” This reference to Hobby Lobby (and the decision in Burwell v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court overturned their convictions, in McDonnell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
And 67-year-old Clarence Thomas is rumored to be mulling retirement so he can spend more time driving around in his RV with his right-wing activist wife.Sure, I wish Hillary Clinton had not followed Colin Powell's lead and used her private email server as Secretary of State. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
See, e.g., In re Dinnan, 661 F.2d 426, 431–32 (5th Cir. 1981); D’Aurizio v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:25 am
The Report also states that had Clinton sought the required approval, it would have been denied due existing State Department guidelines protecting against security risks. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 12:33 pm
Schecter, citing Clinton v Jones, 520 US 681 [Clinton], held that a sitting president is not immune from being sued in state courts for unofficial acts* and denied President Donald J. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:04 pm
Lots also might be said about how a Justice Clinton would approach the future of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
It was energizing to see that you saw the emergence of a children’s civil rights movement and you even championed Justice Douglas’s concurrence in Wisconsin v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:33 pm
See, e.g., Schlesinger v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 1:05 pm
Olson v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court two decades ago in Clinton v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Similarly, putative Senate moderates like Lindsey Graham and John McCain joined in to claim that Clinton’s win did not make her a legitimate president.These Republicans pointed to Clinton’s relatively slim margins of victory in key states like New Hampshire, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. [read post]
