Search for: "State v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co." Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 10:12 am
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Wayne E. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am by Carolina Attorneys
’s uninsured medical expenses; (3). maintain a life insurance policy securing his life with a net death benefit of $1,000,000.00 to T.S. as named beneficiary; (4). pay Wife a total of sixty (60) payments of $1,500.00 per month in alimony; (5). pay Wife’s health insurance premium for the same five years duration; and, (6). maintain a life insurance policy on his life with a net benefit of $1,500,000.00 with Wife as named… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
As the Internet of Things begins to establish a foothold in daily life, ransomware growth seems poised to become more severe and more widespread. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Specifically distinguishing personal injury precedent.In re General American Life Insurance Co. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But even then, insurers imposed co-pays and other cost-sharing devices that shifted much of the cost of birth control to patients. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
European, more than most, worry about this shift in the sources of overseas investments from the perspective of their now decades long objectives to embed human rights more directly in economic activities and political life. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
Decision #1:  Connecticut Supreme Court This morning my friends over at Abnormal Use beat me to a description of the most interesting recent case addressing malfunction theory, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:11 pm
Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., the court held that infertility was an “illness” and that IVF was “medically necessary” treatment for infertilit [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Brian E. Barreira
In the states of Connecticut, New York, Indiana and California—under a national program called the Partnership for Long-Term Care which was initiated by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—various amounts of assets are exempt for Medicaid purposes for persons who have LTC insurance policies that meet state certification standards.(3) Accordingly, persons in those states should have ample reason to look at insurance as a way of… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Substantiation – The employer must have reasonable procedures in place for verifying and substantiating enrollment in individual health insurance coverage. [read post]