Search for: "State v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co." Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Eric Goldman
Harleysville Insurance * It May be Best to Shut Down Your Facebook Account While You are on Probation — State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Title VII was already on the books, but, when first asked in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:49 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
More recently, a Connecticut congressman and Mississippi Attorney General have made a formal request of the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
It therefore adhered to the general rule that " '[i]f the execution of the agreement ... be fair, no further inquiry will be made' " (Levine v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Adriatic Insurance Co.,345 F.3d 190, 204-05 (3d Cir.2003) which suggested an exception to the general rule that a new basis for jurisdiction may not be raised in a revised notice of removal. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
Decision #1:  Connecticut Supreme Court This morning my friends over at Abnormal Use beat me to a description of the most interesting recent case addressing malfunction theory, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
MetLife, 21 No. 40 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 7, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage July 15, 2011Forty-five retired General Motors workers have filed a class-action lawsuit in Michigan state court, accusing Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. of unlawfully reducing their guaranteed life insurance benefits. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 818 A.2d 769 (Conn. 2003), the court held that a Connecticut consumer protection claim escaped preclusion under the state’s exclusive product liability statute because the claim “does not seek a remedy for personal injury, death or property damage. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]