Search for: "State v. Corby" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
Race, feminism and the Grainger criteria At a preliminary hearing in Mr S Corby v Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service [2023] ET 1805305/2022, Mr Corby claimed that he held philosophical beliefs that challenged critical theory in general and a belief in the importance of character over race. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am by Lara
 To Burberry’s credit, it did license the Casablanca image from Corbis, though the Corbis license expressly states: Your ability to access Content does not entitle You to use that Content . . . the rights Corbis grants to You do not include a license to, and Corbis makes no representations or warranties that it owns or licenses any rights related to or in any persons, places, property (real, personal or of any other kind) or subject matter… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:26 am by Sheppard Mullin
The appeal in the case of Cariou v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 11:06 pm by Frank Cranmer
On the conflict between belief and freedom of expression, they list: Higgs v Farmor’s School; Randall v Trent College; Corby v Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service; Miller v University of Bristol; and Lister v New College Swindon. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 8:57 am
* I deleted the following material: - Corbis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Sarah Pavlock and Christine Steiner The appeal in the case of Cariou v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Sarah Pavlock and Christine Steiner The appeal in the case of Cariou v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
By Sarah Pavlock and Christine Steiner The appeal in the case of Cariou v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm by Coral Beach
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]