Search for: "State v. Curiale"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 10:46 am
[Due to some problems with Blogger, our yesterday's post on Videocon v Union of India got deleted. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:03 am
Matter of Gaines v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 4:43 am
The said section 1(2) read: "It extends to the whole of India (except the State of Jammu and Kashmir). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am
The Court relied on McDermott International Inc v Burn Standard Co., where the Supreme Court held: “the 1996 Act makes provision for the supervisory role of courts, for the review of the arbitral award only to ensure fairness. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 3:13 pm
When then New York's Insurance Commissioner Salvatore Curiale seized control of ELNY on April 16, 1991 and placed it in receivership, he stated: "The company is currently neither in an insolvent or impaired condition. . . . [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
However, those early reforms were state-based. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:55 pm
Power In Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 11:07 pm
Although the concurrence in Vavilov maintained the notion of curial deference at para 286, the joint reasons stated at para 31 that “expertise is no longer relevant to a determination of the standard of review as it was in the contextual analysis” given the appropriate respect for legislative choice to delegate the issue to a tribunal. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 12:53 am
Interestingly, the Singapore Court of Appeal in BBA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
