Search for: "State v. Curiale"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 3:23 am
However, as stated in Para 37 of the Earlier Judgement, the Singaporean International Arbitration Act was the curial law.The Earlier Judgement (para 36) stated that as per Bhatia International, Part I was applicable even if the seat was in India. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
Article V.1 provides: “1. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:03 am
The curial law, the SIAC Rules, became applicable once the arbitration commenced and excluded the Applicability of Part I. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:14 pm
With the scope being limited to the premises stated above, decisions of the SC in the matter of Bhatia International , Citation Infowares, Dozco v Doosan; Videocon v Union of India and Gujarat HC’s decision in Hardy Oil are analysed below. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:46 am
[Due to some problems with Blogger, our yesterday's post on Videocon v Union of India got deleted. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
(1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) involved a dispute over a shareholders agreement governed by Indian law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for an arbitration in London, under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC). [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
Subject to the Front Comor argument which I consider later in this judgment, the Court of Appeal’s decision in C v D is to be taken as correctly stating the law. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:03 am
Matter of Gaines v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, D insured C under a Bermuda Form policy that provided for London arbitration and was governed by New York Law. [read post]
