Search for: "State v. Cutting"
Results 21 - 40
of 10,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 11:00 am
Wall Street Journal: States' Rift on Taxes Widens: Minnesota, Others Move to Raise Revenue as Cuts Remain Popular Elsewhere: Minnesota's move to raise $2.1 billion in new taxes, largely from the wealthy, to fund government programs puts it among a handful of states controlled by Democrats that are adopting more... [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:21 pm
The federal government is poised to make a big cut to funding for state and local juvenile justice programs. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:24 am
The case, American Hospital Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
The complaint stems from the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
United States, a constitutional challenge to the mandatory repatriation tax (“MRT”) in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:04 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 7/14/10Cite: Leibowitz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The Court has consolidated three cases on that issue, for one hour of oral argument; the lead case is Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am
”) In Pollock v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Flight A trail of blood through the row house at 4006 Grantley Road in Baltimore, Maryland led police to the kitchen where they found sixty-nine-year-old James Dews dead on the floor from 33 stabbing and cutting wounds. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:00 am
Gouthro v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:23 pm
Cope v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
Facts State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Today, in Sackett v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
The Civil Code states that they own the tree in common. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Last year we wrote a post on the OSHA Law Update blog regarding one very significant, recent case impacting this PPE analysis — Sec’y of Labor v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm
, State v. [read post]
