Search for: "State v. D. C. F." Results 21 - 40 of 5,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]