Search for: "State v. D. Crosby" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
 . fails to satisfy one of the basic requirements for a class action,”  Crosby v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:57 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Crosby v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:32 am by David Zaring
See Vitesse, 771 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, ‘Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it’ ”); see also Crosby v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Crosby, 451 F.3d 1308 (2006) .........................2 Schwab v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
§ 314(d), a party may appeal the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s application of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm by Ryan Scoville
The one-voice doctrine has many critics, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly invoked it, including in modern preemption cases such as Crosby v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
See Nicol J’s fascinating judgment in Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 for a condensed history of this litigation and our comment on it here. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU Charter:… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
The Co-op at 55 Crosby Street According to the complaint in Akasa (read here), the subject property is “a luxury cooperative designed by three well-known architects including Frank Gehry” located at 55 Crosby Street in the fashionable Soho district of Manhattan. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]