Search for: "State v. Daniel B."
Results 21 - 40
of 1,292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
As relevant for present purposes, States are considered as injured by a breach if the breach affects an obligation owed to them directly or, if the obligation is owed erga omnes or erga omnes partes, when the breach specially affects a State to which the obligation is owed (ARS Article 42, paragraphs (a) and (b)(i)). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Daniel L. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
—b/c the TM bar sensed a risk of loss, of limitation. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:59 am
Dustin B. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Chesler, Daniel Slifkin, Vanessa A. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
Chesler, Daniel Slifkin, Vanessa A. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:13 am
As announced by CIPA at the start of the year, Matt Dixon has succeeded Daniel Chew as CIPA president. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Jessica Berch & Daniel J. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
[This de novo statutory interpretation, decontextualized from the precedent, reminded me of the rogue “plain language” appellate court decision in Daniel v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
"] From Elden v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]