Search for: "State v. David Hodges" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Hodges that the federal Constitution does not allow any state to prohibit the celebration or recognition of marriages by same-sex couples. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hodges: The Continuing Battle Over Equal Rights for Sexual Minorities in the United States, (GenIUS, December 2015, at 18).Philip T. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
 It came after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, David Bridge and Jessica Foley, both solicitor-advocates within the CMS litigation & arbitration team, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this summer in the matter of Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, which concerned whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
United States A jury has awarded bakery owner David Gibson damages of $11 million against Oberlin College which had accused Gibsons Bakery of having a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hodges ruling recognizing a constitutional right to marriage equality. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:58 am
The bill would also encourage the creation of a 50-state hodge-podge of tort-based rules impossible for a manufacturer to comply with. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hodges, (March 9, 2015).From SmartCILP:Mahmood Chandia & Kartina A. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am by CMS
Lord Hamblen (with whom Lord Hodge, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales agreed) gave the majority opinion of the court, with Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
These rights will “beat the air” when the UK leaves the EU but they cannot lawfully be defeated by the exercise of the royal prerogative. 14:35: Scoffield QC begins with issue 1 – the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is not neutral to the issue of whether an act of Parliament is needed before the government can give notice under Art 50 TEU. 14:33: David Scoffield QC takes the floor on behalf of Agnew and others – individuals and human rights organisations who are concerned… [read post]